HomeResourcesMental modelsRegret Minimalisation Framework

Regret Minimalisation Framework

Project yourself to the decision horizon and choose the option that you will regret least. Weight omissions heavily, and treat reversibility as a key lever.
Author

Popularised by Jeff Bezos

model type
,
about

Jeff Bezos described using this frame in 1994 to decide whether to start Amazon: imagine yourself at 80, look back, and pick the path with the fewest deep regrets.

The model is a decision heuristic for high-uncertainty, identity-relevant choices.

How it works

Time horizon – pick the age or point-in-time you will judge from (e.g. 80 years old, 10 years out).

Regret typesomissions (things not tried) often sting longer than commissions (tries that failed).

Reversibility – two-way doors invite action; one-way doors raise the evidence bar and risk controls.

Asymmetric bets – prioritise options with capped downside and large upside to minimise future regret.

Identity alignment – choose paths consistent with values you want your future self to endorse.

use-cases

Career moves – role changes, founding a venture, relocating.

Product bets – greenlighting an experiment or entering a niche.

Investing – sizing into a thesis where upside is power-law, downside bounded.

Negotiations – deciding when to walk or accept terms based on future-self view.

Personal commitments – education, partnerships, long projects.

How to apply

Set the horizon – “When I’m [age/date], what will I wish I had done?”

List options with a one-line upside, downside, and probability sketch.

Mark reversibility – two-way or one-way door; add risk caps for one-way doors.

Write the future note – a 5–7 line letter from your future self about likely regrets for each option.

Choose the least-regret path; act now on the first reversible step and calendar a review.

pitfalls & cautions

Fantasy future self – idealised horizons that ignore current constraints and base rates.

Action bias – doing for its own sake; still reject bad EV moves even if “bold”.

Status quo disguise – using the frame to rationalise inaction; compare regrets of not trying.

One-way door blindness – underestimating irreversibility; add guardrails before leaping.

Value drift – revisit as values or circumstances change; the horizon can move.